Four months ago this week, residents in South Florida were anxiously watching the tropics as Hurricane Ike formed in the Atlantic Ocean. For two agonizing days, the Palm Beaches was ground zero in the National Hurricane Center’s “cone of uncertainty.”
Thankfully for us, a large high-pressure system steered Ike south of Florida. Unfortunately, the storm slammed into Cuba and eventually made landfall near Galveston, Texas, becoming the costliest hurricane in Texas history.
During those two days in early September when it looked like Ike was headed our way, I fielded more than a few phone calls from folks wondering why science can’t do something about these huge storms.
“If we can put a man on the moon,” some folks would say to me. “Why can’t we weaken a hurricane?”
We did try once. Back in the 1960’s and ‘70’s, the U.S. Government created Project Stormfury, an attempt to weaken tropical storms and hurricanes by flying aircraft into the storms and seeding them with silver iodide.
While the theory (silver iodide would cause supercooled water in the storm to freeze, disrupting the inner structure of the hurricane) had merit, the scientific team could never determine if the structural changes in the storm were produced by the seeding or just natural fluctations of the the hurricane.
A big part of the problem is the sheer size and power of a hurricane. A typical storm will cover hundreds of miles and reach thousands of feet into the atmosphere. The energy released by a hurricane is mind-boggling, as much as 500,000 atom bombs.
Still, science hasn’t given up. Researchers from Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Isreal think they’ve come up with a new way to weaken a hurricane. They want to blow smoke into a storm.
The group believes that injecting tiny smoke particles into the bottom part of a hurricane will cause water vapor to condense at a lower altitude than normally occurs in a hurricane.
Why is this important? If the water vapor condenses at that lower altitude it will lead to the formation of water droplets that are too small to become raindrops. It is the formation of these raindrops that leads to the release of latent heat energy that gives the storm its destructive power.
Bottom line: fewer raindrops mean a weaker hurricane.
Computer models of the theory have been promising. Daniel Rosenfield, the scientist who came up with the idea, said wind speeds were cut by 25 percent in the simulations. That is a significant drop in the power of a storm that could conceivably turn a major hurricane into a much weaker storm.
Still, while it may be possible to weaken a hurricane in a computer model, doing it in real life is something else entirely. Just to get enough smoke particles into a storm, Rosenfield estimates, would require 5 to 10 cargo airplanes filled with the stuff. At present, no one has come up with the money for Rosenfield to field-test his theory.
Of course, the bigger question is should we even fool around with Mother Nature? Hurricanes are a natural part of the planet, helping to transport heat from the equator to other parts of our world.
I guess it all depends on WHEN you ask the question. It sure seemed like a good idea four months ago.